• February 23, 2018, 02:25:05 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search

News:

Forum/Membership Maintenance: last completed on Monday 9th November 2015

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Call for secret search warrants lashed by civil libertarians, security experts  (Read 195 times)

Prickle

  • Forum Moderator
  • Legendary Vent Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 44
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17750

Call for secret search warrants lashed by civil libertarians, security experts

Federal investigators want the power to secretly search homes and workplaces, saying the rise of new technology such as message encryption and cryptocurrencies is making it harder to root out corruption and other serious crimes.

As critics warned against parliamentarians approving an "outrageous" increase in police powers, the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity has told an inquiry that the use of delayed notification search warrants should be widened because conventional surveillance techniques are becoming easier to evade.

So-called "sneak and peek" warrants are limited to terrorism investigations for the Australian Federal Police, Victorian, Queensland, Western Australia and Northern Territory police. NSW Police can additionally use them for serious crimes that carry a sentence of at least seven years' jail, including murder, drug manufacturing, money laundering and fraud.

The warrants allow officers to search a suspect's premises and seize evidence without needing to tell the owner or occupier for months or years, if at all, to avoid tipping them off that they are being investigated. In some cases, police can enter a neighbouring premises to gain access to the suspect's home or workplace.

The secretive ACLEI is responsible for investigating corruption and misconduct across federal law enforcement agencies, including the AFP, Australian Border Force, the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission and anti-money laundering regulator AUSTRAC. It is the closest the Federal government has to an anti-corruption watchdog.

In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry looking at how advances in computer and communications technology are hampering law enforcement's ability to carry out investigations, ACLEI said it relied on covert means to gather evidence but the task was getting harder.

"Many of the potential challenges for law enforcement investigation capability arising from new and emerging ICT-encryption, multiple data storage platforms, dark web, cryptocurrency, social media and messaging apps have been broadly referred to as 'going dark'," the submission said.

ACLEI said the government's metadata retention regime for telecommunications companies had been an important step for investigations but it believed the introduction of delayed notification search warrants merited consideration.

"Since corruption thrives on secrecy – and law enforcement corruption thrives on insider knowledge to hide tracks and avoid detection – a DNSW regime would be a particularly valuable means of ACLEI obtaining information covertly, especially when the effectiveness of ICT surveillance methods may become more limited in future," the submission said.

ACLEI's request has sparked a fierce response, with the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's head of border security, John Coyne, saying it was an outrageous power grab.

"It just arms them as a secret police against our police," said Dr Coyne, a former federal police officer.

"Our law enforcement does a lot in this country. Are we willing to subject them to more intrusive checks on their privacy?"

Dr Coyne said the success in targeting crooked cops and other law enforcement officers suggested watchdogs had enough powers to do their jobs as it is.

NSW Council for Civil Liberties president Stephen Blanks said he was concerned about the possibility of "function creep" with more and more law enforcement agencies pushing to use secret warrants.

"It's always disturbing when powers are given to agencies for terrorism, then another agency says they would like to use those for something else," he said.

"That is a problem with not drawing a line in the sand that says some powers are just too dangerous to be given to government agencies."

A spokesman for new Attorney-General Christian Porter said the government would consider the issue when the inquiry's final report was complete.

http://www.afr.com/news/politics/call-for-secret-search-warrants-lashed-by-civil-libertarians-security-experts-20180111-h0gn2o#ixzz54IX3mxcG
Logged
SINNERS MCC Brisbane Australia
“Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.”
Pages: [1]   Go Up